The New York Times said on Thursday it is suing the US defense department and the defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, after the Trump administration imposed restrictions for the press on access privileges and source-based reporting at the Pentagon, The Guardian reports.
Journalists assigned to cover the Pentagon were asked in October to agree to new rules telling them not to solicit information that had not been approved by Hegseth. The extra restrictions were also designed to limit their movements around the military command headquarters in Arlington, Virginia, just across the Potomac River from Washington DC. As a result, many leading outlets turned in their credentials in protest.
Charlie Stadtlander, a spokesperson for the New York Times, said in a statement that the decision “is an attempt to exert control over reporting the government dislikes” and the Times “intends to vigorously defend against the violation of these rights”.
The leading US newspaper company filed a federal lawsuit in US district court in Washington DC alleging that the government was infringing on its journalists’ constitutional rights.
The Pentagon’s policy “is exactly the type of speech- and press-restrictive scheme that the supreme court and DC circuit have recognized violates the first amendment” of the US constitution, the company said.
The Pentagon had asked reporters to sign a 21-page form that includes agreeing to not “solicit government employees to violate the law by providing confidential government information” or encourage employees to share “nonpublic” agency information.
The lawsuit argues that the new policies violate free speech protections and “seeks to restrict journalists’ ability to do what journalists have always done – ask questions of government employees and gather information to report stories that take the public beyond official pronouncements”.
The suit said that “reporting any information not approved by department officials” could lead to punishment, “regardless of whether such news gathering occurs on or off Pentagon grounds, and regardless of whether the information at issue is classified or unclassified”.
It also argues that that the policy changes are designed “to fundamentally restrict coverage of the Pentagon by independent journalists and news organizations, either by limiting what kind of information they can obtain and publish without incurring punishment, or by driving them out of the Pentagon with an unconstitutional policy”.
Most major news organizations have aligned to resist the Pentagon’s press policy changes.
